The Shaky Science Behind Forensics
There doesn’t seem to be an awful lot of scientific rigor in forensic science – but a great deal of the “I know good evidence when I see it” type of science:
On television and in the movies, forensic examiners unravel difficult cases with a combination of scientific acumen, cutting-edge technology and dogged persistence. The gee-whiz wonder of it all has spawned its own media-age legal phenomenon known as the “CSI effect.” Jurors routinely afford confident scientific experts an almost mythic infallibility because they evoke the bold characters from crime dramas. The real world of forensic science, however, is far different. America’s forensic labs are overburdened, understaffed and under intense pressure from prosecutors to produce results. According to a 2005 study by the Department of Justice, the average lab has a backlog of 401 requests for services. Plus, several state and city forensic departments have been racked by scandals involving mishandled evidence and outright fraud.
But criminal forensics has a deeper problem of basic validity. Bite marks, blood-splatter patterns, ballistics, and hair, fiber and handwriting analysis sound compelling in the courtroom, but much of the “science” behind forensic science rests on surprisingly shaky foundations. Many well-established forms of evidence are the product of highly subjective analysis by people with minimal credentials—according to the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors, no advanced degree is required for a career in forensics. And even the most experienced and respected professionals can come to inaccurate conclusions, because the body of research behind the majority of the forensic sciences is incomplete, and the established methodologies are often inexact. “There is no scientific foundation for it,” says Arizona State University law professor Michael Saks. “As you begin to unpack it you find it’s a lot of loosey-goosey stuff.”
Even fingerprint identification is not as reliable as it is universally assumed to be - and it’s considered one of the gold standards of evidence.
Related posts:
- Search Engine for Crime-Related Web Sites It’s called Crime Spider, and you can search it by any of the multitude of categories, from juvenile crime to private investigation, mystery books and...
- Is It Only a Hate Crime When Whites Beat Up Blacks? No hate crime here, move along: A group of 10-15 blacks in Buffalo, New York, brutally beat up a white boy for dating a black girl....
- Crime-Scene DNA Samples Could Be Used to Draw Pictures of Suspects In the field of DNA forensics, scientists identify genetic markers for traits revealing appearance and ethnicity: Researchers are identifying genes that give rise to a...
- 9 Lousy Years, for This?! Cannibal cult mother who skinned her son and made him eat his own flesh gets 9 years in jail. In the Czech Republic - not Britain,...
- Policing in Canada Compared to the U.K. A Canadian cop that was a British cop before compares the two systems of policing: I certainly have fewer powers than I did before: -I’m...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.